System & Environment Quality Analysis. Continuous Assurance & Verification.

Trust, verify, and resolve that your critical systems, processes, workflows, and operations work as intended.

Know that your business-critical operations & capabilities are running as intended.

New hire onboarded→Every day-one app reachableVerified

What’s true right nowUp to date

Every verification, worst first, re-run on its own schedule.

Verification

State

Health

30 days

A closed deal becomes an invoice within 15 minutes

Check

Failed at step 441

Month-end close jobs finish in order before 06:00

Trace

31 of 31 on time91

Every customer-facing certificate renews 30 days ahead

Sweep

64 of 64 clear100

Chrome security policy changes don't break browsing for employees

Delta

1 effect drifted74

Policy change: DownloadRestrictions set to block dangerous files · Tue 09:00 · 2,140 browsers

Week before → week after

Pages load without a policy block

99.4%→99.3%

Required extensions install

98.1%→98.0%

Downloads blocked, mostly Finance

0.4%→6.8%

Sign-in prompts per person, daily

1.1→1.2

Only current staff can reach finance systems

Sweep

212 of 212 clear78

Field laptops check in and receive updates daily

Check

Passed88

Identity

Okta
SailPoint
JumpCloud
•••

Cloud

AWS
Azure
Google Cloud
•••

Endpoints & Devices

Jamf
Kandji
NinjaOne
•••

Data Platforms

Snowflake
Databricks
ClickHouse
•••

Networking

Cisco
Cloudflare
Tailscale
•••

Identity, cloud, devices, networks, and data, plus the business systems that depend on them, like Oracle and Workday.

Critical operations run on assumed state, spread across a hundred consoles, until a failed restore, a missed close, or an audit proves otherwise.

The backup that never restored. The leaver who kept access. The change that quietly broke onboarding.

Panaptico reads live state from the systems that already own it, across every environment you run.

Checks, Sweeps, Traces, and Deltas verify every process, target, run, and change against what you intended.

When something stops holding, you see what broke, why, and how to resolve it, with evidence for every answer.

Continuous Operational Verification

Verify that your operations
are working as intended.

Define how your systems and processes should work. Panaptico uses the telemetry and records from your existing tools to check whether those conditions hold every day. See where outcomes are degrading, steps are being missed, or a change is affecting something downstream.

  • Was a contractor’s access fully revoked?
  • Are daily backups meeting recovery requirements?
  • Did a configuration change disrupt a dependent service?

Does this still work?

One process or control, answered with pass or fail.

A Check walks a real process, step by step, against your live systems: a new hire signs in to every app, a backup restores, a sales rep creates a quote. Each step must observe what it expects, and cleanup always runs.

  • Passed, failed, or could not verify. Never a guess.
  • The failing step, and what it observed, named
  • Read-only by default. Any step that writes is marked first.

Check · every hour · Salesforce to Oracle

A closed deal becomes an invoice within 15 minutes

Running

Close a test deal in Salesforce

Met

Opportunity OPP-58213 set to Closed Won

Generate and approve the quote

Met

Quote Q-20481 approved in 2.1s

Order reaches Oracle

Running

…

Invoice created within 15 minutes

Waiting

…

Customer receives the invoice email

Waiting

…

Remove the test deal, quote and order

Waiting

Why it failed

Oracle’s invoicing job has been paused since Tuesday’s patch

ExpectedInvoice within 15 min

ObservedNo invoice

Last passedTuesday, 18:00

Also affected37 real orders, $412k

Fix

Resume the invoicing schedule, then re-run the 37 orders

Last 14 runs

hourly

Failing for 4 hours. Nobody had noticed.

01

Describe it in plain language

Name what must keep working. Panaptico designs the steps, what each must observe, and the cleanup. Or start from a template.

02

What it proves, and what it can't

Every verification states what it proves and what it cannot establish, so nobody reads more into a pass than it earned.

03

Nothing runs until you say so

Preview the whole chain first. Steps are read-only by default, and anything that writes is marked before it can run.

04

Every run on the record

Each run keeps what it observed, how long it took, and whether it held, so any result can be replayed and explained.

System & Environment Quality Analysis

See what’s proven.
And what nobody has checked yet.

Most teams can’t say which of their critical processes are verified and which are assumed. Panaptico maps every system you connect, proposes what should be verified, and shows exactly where coverage stops.

Coverage Map · from a read-only scan

What's proven, and what nobody has checked yet

2,221

Catalogued

124

Mapped

99

Proposed

38

Built

29

Proven

Okta6 of 64 proven
Microsoft 3655 of 118 proven
Veeam2 of 31 proven

Biggest gap

61 proposed verifications nobody has built yet

Most are in Microsoft 365 licensing and Okta leavers.

Coverage Map

A read-only scan proposes every verification your systems deserve, then shows how far each got: catalogued, mapped, proposed, built, proven. The biggest gap is always named.

Domains

Bring coverage together around what the business needs to do: Employee Onboarding, Data Backup, Month-End Close. Each domain shows its people, its assets, and what's still missing.

Environments

Most verifications run in a hosted sandbox. When one depends on where it runs, it can run on a machine you already have, inside your own network.

Operating priorities

Your operating priorities, continuously verified.

Verify backup evidence, replication health, restore-path freshness, failover capacity, and the dependencies behind recovery.

See Sweeps

Track the resources expected in scope, compare live provider state with declared targets, and keep missing coverage or stale evidence visible.

See the Coverage Map

See exhausted headroom, fragile dependencies, and backup paths that looked redundant but are not.

See Cloud & Compute

Keep each conclusion tied to its evaluated scope, target condition, coverage, freshness, definition, evidence, and full state history.

See Checks

Baseline the system before migration or modernization, then compare behavior, dependencies, data, and service outcomes through the transition.

See Cloud & Compute

Verify the configuration, coverage, and relationships that define a healthy system, all evaluated together. Tailscale is one example: every device, person, access rule, and key, checked as one.

See system-quality assurance

Recovery assurance

billing-db-prod01 · tier-1

2 gaps
Backup successJan 22 · 04:18At target

8 of 8 production databases reported inside the 24h window

Replication lag4.2sAt target

Standby within declared RPO of 30 seconds

!Restore proof41 days oldStale

Last successful restore test exceeds the 30-day freshness window

?Failover capacityunobservedUnknown

Standby sizing has no current evidence, so it's treated as Unknown

A configured backup is not a proven recovery

41 days

since the last successful restore proof

8 / 8

backups inside the 24h window

How it works

A straight line from intent to assurance.

Define what must be true. Panaptico maps the scope, observes live evidence, verifies each condition, and keeps the result trustworthy over time.

01What must be true?

Start with the outcome, not the tool.

Describe how the system must behave, who or what it applies to, what must never happen, and how current the proof needs to be.

Read the documentation

Domain · Intent

Billing Platform Can Be Recovered

Definition · v1

Declared outcome

The billing platform can be restored within its declared RPO, with restore proof never older than 30 days.

Required conditions

01Every production database backs up inside the 24h window
02Replication lag stays inside the declared RPO
03A successful restore drill exists inside 30 days
04Standby capacity fits the production workload
05Two recovery cycles retained for every service
Define what must be true before any tool enters the picture

8

production databases in scope

30d

restore-proof freshness window

FAQs

What teams ask before they connect anything.

What Panaptico checks, what it reads, and how it fits alongside the tools you already run.

That your systems and processes work the way you defined them to. A contractor's access is fully revoked when their contract ends. The nightly backup completes and meets its recovery target. A configuration change leaves dependent services working. You describe the expected behaviour, and Panaptico checks it every day against what your existing tools record.

They are four ways to describe what should hold. A Check tests one condition. A Sweep tests the same condition across every target, such as every database or every laptop. A Trace follows each run of a recurring process, like offboarding or a backup job, against its expected steps and deadlines. A Delta compares behaviour before and after a change your team made, so effects downstream don't go unnoticed.

Monitoring tells you a service is up or a metric crossed a threshold. Panaptico tells you whether the outcome is right: the backup ran and is restorable, every leaver lost access, a change didn't slow a job two systems away. It reads from the monitoring and logging tools you already have instead of replacing them.

A CMDB records what you have. A compliance tool records what you've attested to. Panaptico checks whether things actually work the way you defined, using live telemetry, and shows plainly where it couldn't tell.

An agent can answer a question once. Panaptico runs the same logic every day, against the same definition, and keeps the history. That is how a slow decline, like backups shrinking week over week or one step of offboarding getting skipped, shows up before it becomes an outage.

No. Panaptico reads telemetry, logs, and records from the tools you connect. It does not write to, reconfigure, or act on those systems. When something isn't working as intended, it shows you what and where, and your team decides what to do.

The result shows as Unknown. Panaptico never carries forward the last good reading or assumes a pass, so a gap in telemetry stays visible instead of hiding a problem.

No. Start with one process you can't afford to get wrong, like offboarding or nightly backups, and add more from there.

No. Describe how a process should work in plain language, or start from a template. Panaptico drafts the logic, shows which data it will use, and nothing goes live until you publish it.

Every result links to the data it was based on, when that data was collected, and the version of the logic that judged it. Deployment and data residency are set up with each customer.

You decide what must be true.
Panaptico proves it, continuously.

Trust, verify, and resolve the systems, processes, workflows, and operations your business depends on.