Panaptico checks them continuously, writes the fix when something breaks, and keeps the evidence behind every result.
Panaptico · Overview
Enablements
15 capabilities across 12 workspaces · evaluated 4 min ago
3 of 15 capabilities not enabled
A required check is failing in each. Backup recovery and checkout performance lead the list.
Capability health
64%
78% confidence
Enabled
6
1 more unknown
At risk or degraded
5
3 at risk · 2 degraded
Not enabled
3
a required check failed
Backups Restore Within the Recovery Window
every tier-1 database
Checkout Stays Fast at Peak Load
payments API on Cloud Run
New Hires Are Productive on Day One
Okta, Google Workspace, and Jamf
Customer Email Always Delivers
all sending domains
Leavers Lose Access the Same Day
every HR termination
35
Backup recovery: one required check failing
Identity
Cloud
Endpoints & Devices
Data Platforms
Networking
Identity, cloud, devices, networks, data, and the tools your teams already work in.
The platform
Enablements say what the business needs. Policies and monitors read the evidence. Remediation closes the gap, and Templates get you started. Workflow verifications, below, run the process itself.
Name what the business needs to be true: new hires are productive on day one, checkout stays fast at peak, backups restore inside the recovery window. Panaptico scores each capability from its requirements and shows exactly where every point went.
Explore EnablementsEnablement · Business continuity
Not enabledBackups Restore Within the Recovery Window
Every tier-1 database can be restored to a clean environment inside its four-hour recovery window.
35%
Not enabled
83% confidence
Requirements
2 of 7 healthy
3 failed · 2 unknown
Coverage
85%
of weight backed by decisive evidence
Evaluation
Every 15 minutes
stale after 60 minutes
Owner
Platform Engineering
with Database Reliability
How 100 became 35
1 required check failing
No restore test in 41 days makes the capability Not enabled — no averaging it away.
2 unknowns cost points
Workflow Verification
A verification is a short chain of steps — reads, writes, or a cloud browser — that walks a real process against your live systems: a new hire can reach every app on day one, a user can reset their password, a backup actually restores. Each step must observe what it expects. Cleanup always runs.
Explore Workflow VerificationWorkflow Verification · Runs
A new hire can sign in and reach their apps
Okta + cloud browser
3 steps + cleanupOKTA_API_TOKEN · TEST_HIRE_PROFILE
Create a test hire in Okta
Step 1 · Code · Writes
Sign in as the test hire
Step 2 · Cloud browser · Read-only
Open Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira
Step 3 · Cloud browser · Read-only
Deactivate and delete the test hire
Cleanup · always runs
Steps met
3/3
Cleanup
Done
Duration
0:41
History
Step 3: Jira returned 403
Every app loaded as the new hire — onboarding works end to end, and the test hire is gone.
Step 3 expected
3 of 3 apps
loaded as the new hire
Name the process that must keep working — or must stay blocked. AI designs the steps, what each must observe, and the cleanup.
Preview the whole chain first. Steps are read-only by default, and any step that writes is marked before it can run.
Pick vault credentials by name. Values resolve server-side, only when the verification runs.
Each step keeps what it observed, how long it took, and whether it met its expectation — ready to replay.
Operating priorities
Verify backup evidence, replication health, restore-path freshness, failover capacity, and the dependencies behind recovery.
Explore recovery assuranceTrack the resources expected in scope, compare live provider state with declared targets, and keep missing coverage or stale evidence visible.
Explore Policies & PostureSee exhausted headroom, retry amplification, fragile dependencies, and paths that looked redundant but are not.
See system qualityKeep each conclusion tied to its evaluated scope, target condition, coverage, freshness, definition, evidence, and full state history.
See MonitoringBaseline the system before migration or modernization, then compare behavior, dependencies, data, and service outcomes through the transition.
Explore modernizationVerify the configuration, coverage, relationships, and evidence that define a healthy system. Tailscale is one example: devices, identities, ACLs, tags, routes, subnet routers, exit nodes, and key freshness all evaluated together.
See system-quality assuranceRecovery assurance
billing-db-prod01 · tier-1
2 gaps8 of 8 production databases reported inside the 24h window
Standby within declared RPO of 30 seconds
Last successful restore test exceeds the 30-day freshness window
Standby sizing has no current evidence — treated as Unknown
41 days
since the last successful restore proof
8 / 8
backups inside the 24h window
How it works
Define what must be true. Panaptico maps the scope, observes live evidence, verifies each condition, and keeps the result trustworthy over time.
Describe how the system must behave, who or what it applies to, what must never happen, and how current the proof needs to be.
Read the documentationEnablement
Billing Platform Can Be Recovered
Definition · v1Declared outcome
The billing platform can be restored within its declared RPO — with restore proof never older than 30 days.
Required conditions
8
production databases in scope
30d
restore-proof freshness window
Datasets
Restricted apps, approved AMIs, the HR roster — the targets that never live in a provider API. Datasets make them first-class verification inputs: uploaded once, imported live from another workspace, or maintained by an agent on a cadence.
Dataset · Upload
restricted-apps
v3 · 214 rowsrestricted-apps.csv
uploaded Aug 12 · replaces v2 · history kept
Field rule · approval_state
restricted-apps.csv
214 rows · versioned
Upload structured or unstructured data — banned apps, approved vendors, gold AMIs. Add a field that evaluates live resources against it: if the app is on the list, it's Banned. The file becomes a tracked, versioned input — not a spreadsheet someone forgets.
Direct answers about scope, access, evidence, deployment, and how Panaptico fits into the systems already in place.
Panaptico compares observed state from connected systems with conditions your organization declares. A result can apply to a field, resource, population, system, or business capability. Every result retains its scope, coverage, freshness, definition, history, and supporting evidence.
Monitoring shows that a metric moved or an event occurred. Panaptico evaluates whether the resources and conditions your organization expects still satisfy their declared targets. Monitoring data can become evidence inside Panaptico; it is not something Panaptico needs to replace.
A CMDB records inventory. A scanner applies vendor-defined findings or benchmarks. Panaptico continuously evaluates live provider state against organization-specific targets, preserves Unknown and incomplete coverage, and keeps the evidence and change history behind each verdict.
An agent can retrieve a point-in-time answer. It does not automatically maintain the expected population, persistent target, evidence freshness, coverage denominator, versioned evaluation logic, and history across systems. Panaptico maintains that verification contract so humans and agents can rely on the same answer.
Verification starts with scoped observation. Permission to read evidence is not treated as permission to mutate a provider. Any execution or write path, where enabled, is separately authorized and explicit rather than implied by the connection. Workflow verifications are read-only by default: steps that write are marked before anything runs, nothing runs until you press Run, and cleanup always runs.
The result becomes Unknown or Unobserved. It does not silently inherit the last good value and it never becomes a manufactured pass. The missing scope and evidence remain visible until the system can evaluate them again.
No. A team can begin with one load-bearing system, one resource population, or one operating condition that it cannot afford to misunderstand. The same model then expands through additional policies, monitors, systems, and cross-system capabilities.
Tracked fields define how a provider value is acquired and the condition that value must satisfy. Each reconciliation evaluates the observed value against that target and records whether it is at target, off target, observed without a target, or unknown—with history for every transition.
Access is scoped to the APIs, resources, and evidence required by the connected system and the conditions being verified. Missing permissions stay visible as missing coverage or Unknown rather than being hidden behind a green status.
Panaptico is designed around inspectable evidence and customer-controlled data architecture. Deployment and residency requirements are handled with the customer, while every result remains traceable to its source, timestamp, freshness, and definition version.
Continuously verify the systems, changes, and controls your business depends on.