Continuous system assurance

Trust, resolve, and verify that your critical systems, dependencies, recovery paths, and controls work as intended.

Panaptico checks them continuously, writes the fix when something breaks, and keeps the evidence behind every result.

AI agent action approved→Required controls passedVerified

Panaptico · Overview

Enablements

15 capabilities across 12 workspaces · evaluated 4 min ago

PoliciesPostureEnablementsReportsMonitoringWorkflow VerificationTemplates
Act now

3 of 15 capabilities not enabled

A required check is failing in each. Backup recovery and checkout performance lead the list.

Capability health

64%

78% confidence

Enabled

6

1 more unknown

At risk or degraded

5

3 at risk · 2 degraded

Not enabled

3

a required check failed

CapabilityStateHealth30 days

Backups Restore Within the Recovery Window

every tier-1 database

Not enabled35

Checkout Stays Fast at Peak Load

payments API on Cloud Run

Not enabled44

New Hires Are Productive on Day One

Okta, Google Workspace, and Jamf

Degraded58

Customer Email Always Delivers

all sending domains

At risk72

Leavers Lose Access the Same Day

every HR termination

Enabled96
Business capabilities, scored with receipts

35

Backup recovery: one required check failing

Unknown never counts as healthy

Identity

Okta
SailPoint
JumpCloud
•••

Cloud

AWS
Azure
Google Cloud
•••

Endpoints & Devices

Jamf
Kandji
NinjaOne
•••

Data Platforms

Snowflake
Databricks
ClickHouse
•••

Networking

Cisco
Cloudflare
Tailscale
•••

Identity, cloud, devices, networks, data, and the tools your teams already work in.

Enterprises run on assumed state across a hundred disconnected consoles — until an outage, audit, or breach proves otherwise.

The firewall rule that does nothing. The backup that never ran. The access that outlived the contract.

Panaptico streams signals, state, and telemetry into one live operational model of the entities that matter.

Declare intent once. Panaptico verifies reality against it — continuously, with evidence for every claim.

When reality diverges, action is routed instantly — and every claim resolves into verified proof.

The platform

What must be true, proven.
Every claim with its receipts.

Enablements say what the business needs. Policies and monitors read the evidence. Remediation closes the gap, and Templates get you started. Workflow verifications, below, run the process itself.

Business capabilities, scored — and explained.

Name what the business needs to be true: new hires are productive on day one, checkout stays fast at peak, backups restore inside the recovery window. Panaptico scores each capability from its requirements and shows exactly where every point went.

Explore Enablements
  • A health score and a confidence, never one without the other
  • A failing required control marks the capability Not enabled — no averaging it away
  • Unknown evidence costs points and is never counted as healthy

Enablement · Business continuity

Not enabled

Backups Restore Within the Recovery Window

Every tier-1 database can be restored to a clean environment inside its four-hour recovery window.

35%

Not enabled

83% confidence

Requirements

2 of 7 healthy

3 failed · 2 unknown

Coverage

85%

of weight backed by decisive evidence

Evaluation

Every 15 minutes

stale after 60 minutes

Owner

Platform Engineering

with Database Reliability

How 100 became 35

Full weight100
A restore was tested in the last 30 days−30
Backups replicate to a second region−10
Snapshots are kept for 14 days−10
Standby capacity fits production load−10
Restore runbook reviewed this quarter−5
Health score35
Every point on the score is accounted for

1 required check failing

No restore test in 41 days makes the capability Not enabled — no averaging it away.

2 unknowns cost points

Workflow Verification

Don’t trust the configuration.
Run the process.

A verification is a short chain of steps — reads, writes, or a cloud browser — that walks a real process against your live systems: a new hire can reach every app on day one, a user can reset their password, a backup actually restores. Each step must observe what it expects. Cleanup always runs.

Explore Workflow Verification

Workflow Verification · Runs

A new hire can sign in and reach their apps

Final state0:41Daily · 06:00 UTC1 step writes

Okta + cloud browser

3 steps + cleanup

OKTA_API_TOKEN · TEST_HIRE_PROFILE

Create a test hire in Okta

Step 1 · Code · Writes

Observed ACTIVE · 4 apps assignedMet · 5s

Sign in as the test hire

Step 2 · Cloud browser · Read-only

Observed session establishedMet · 11s

Open Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira

Step 3 · Cloud browser · Read-only

Observed 3 of 3 apps loadedMet · 12s

Deactivate and delete the test hire

Cleanup · always runs

Observed user deletedMet · 6s
Passedjust now

Steps met

3/3

Cleanup

Done

Duration

0:41

History

Passednow
Passed1d ago0:39
Passed2d ago0:42
Failed3d ago0:40

Step 3: Jira returned 403

Every app loaded as the new hire — onboarding works end to end, and the test hire is gone.

Prove onboarding actually works

Step 3 expected

3 of 3 apps

loaded as the new hire

Cleanup always runs
01

Describe it, or take a suggestion

Name the process that must keep working — or must stay blocked. AI designs the steps, what each must observe, and the cleanup.

02

Nothing runs until you press Run

Preview the whole chain first. Steps are read-only by default, and any step that writes is marked before it can run.

03

Credentials by name, never value

Pick vault credentials by name. Values resolve server-side, only when the verification runs.

04

Every run on the record

Each step keeps what it observed, how long it took, and whether it met its expectation — ready to replay.

Operating priorities

Your operating priorities, continuously verified.

Verify backup evidence, replication health, restore-path freshness, failover capacity, and the dependencies behind recovery.

Explore recovery assurance

Track the resources expected in scope, compare live provider state with declared targets, and keep missing coverage or stale evidence visible.

Explore Policies & Posture

See exhausted headroom, retry amplification, fragile dependencies, and paths that looked redundant but are not.

See system quality

Keep each conclusion tied to its evaluated scope, target condition, coverage, freshness, definition, evidence, and full state history.

See Monitoring

Baseline the system before migration or modernization, then compare behavior, dependencies, data, and service outcomes through the transition.

Explore modernization

Verify the configuration, coverage, relationships, and evidence that define a healthy system. Tailscale is one example: devices, identities, ACLs, tags, routes, subnet routers, exit nodes, and key freshness all evaluated together.

See system-quality assurance

Recovery assurance

billing-db-prod01 · tier-1

2 gaps
Backup successJan 22 · 04:18At target

8 of 8 production databases reported inside the 24h window

Replication lag4.2sAt target

Standby within declared RPO of 30 seconds

!Restore proof41 days oldStale

Last successful restore test exceeds the 30-day freshness window

?Failover capacityunobservedUnknown

Standby sizing has no current evidence — treated as Unknown

A configured backup is not a proven recovery

41 days

since the last successful restore proof

8 / 8

backups inside the 24h window

How it works

A straight line from intent to assurance.

Define what must be true. Panaptico maps the scope, observes live evidence, verifies each condition, and keeps the result trustworthy over time.

01What must be true?

Start with the outcome, not the tool.

Describe how the system must behave, who or what it applies to, what must never happen, and how current the proof needs to be.

Read the documentation

Enablement

Billing Platform Can Be Recovered

Definition · v1

Declared outcome

The billing platform can be restored within its declared RPO — with restore proof never older than 30 days.

Required conditions

01Every production database backs up inside the 24h window
02Replication lag stays inside the declared RPO
03A successful restore drill exists inside 30 days
04Standby capacity fits the production workload
05Two recovery cycles retained for every service
Define what must be true before any tool enters the picture

8

production databases in scope

30d

restore-proof freshness window

Datasets

Live state is half the story.
Your context is the other half.

Restricted apps, approved AMIs, the HR roster — the targets that never live in a provider API. Datasets make them first-class verification inputs: uploaded once, imported live from another workspace, or maintained by an agent on a cadence.

Dataset · Upload

restricted-apps

v3 · 214 rows

restricted-apps.csv

uploaded Aug 12 · replaces v2 · history kept

Field rule · approval_state

detected_app.nameis inrestricted-appsthen markBanned
AppAddedState
AnyDeskAug 12, 2026Banned
TeamViewerAug 12, 2026Banned
uTorrentJul 30, 2026Banned
LimeWireJul 30, 2026Banned
A policy list becomes a tracked input — not a forgotten spreadsheet

restricted-apps.csv

214 rows · versioned

AnyDeskBanned

Start with a file.

Upload structured or unstructured data — banned apps, approved vendors, gold AMIs. Add a field that evaluates live resources against it: if the app is on the list, it's Banned. The file becomes a tracked, versioned input — not a spreadsheet someone forgets.

Structured or unstructured — CSV, JSON, even a pasted list
Versioned on every replace, with full history
Fields evaluate live resources against the dataset on every reconciliation
FAQs

What teams ask before they trust the result.

Direct answers about scope, access, evidence, deployment, and how Panaptico fits into the systems already in place.

Panaptico compares observed state from connected systems with conditions your organization declares. A result can apply to a field, resource, population, system, or business capability. Every result retains its scope, coverage, freshness, definition, history, and supporting evidence.

Monitoring shows that a metric moved or an event occurred. Panaptico evaluates whether the resources and conditions your organization expects still satisfy their declared targets. Monitoring data can become evidence inside Panaptico; it is not something Panaptico needs to replace.

A CMDB records inventory. A scanner applies vendor-defined findings or benchmarks. Panaptico continuously evaluates live provider state against organization-specific targets, preserves Unknown and incomplete coverage, and keeps the evidence and change history behind each verdict.

An agent can retrieve a point-in-time answer. It does not automatically maintain the expected population, persistent target, evidence freshness, coverage denominator, versioned evaluation logic, and history across systems. Panaptico maintains that verification contract so humans and agents can rely on the same answer.

Verification starts with scoped observation. Permission to read evidence is not treated as permission to mutate a provider. Any execution or write path, where enabled, is separately authorized and explicit rather than implied by the connection. Workflow verifications are read-only by default: steps that write are marked before anything runs, nothing runs until you press Run, and cleanup always runs.

The result becomes Unknown or Unobserved. It does not silently inherit the last good value and it never becomes a manufactured pass. The missing scope and evidence remain visible until the system can evaluate them again.

No. A team can begin with one load-bearing system, one resource population, or one operating condition that it cannot afford to misunderstand. The same model then expands through additional policies, monitors, systems, and cross-system capabilities.

Tracked fields define how a provider value is acquired and the condition that value must satisfy. Each reconciliation evaluates the observed value against that target and records whether it is at target, off target, observed without a target, or unknown—with history for every transition.

Access is scoped to the APIs, resources, and evidence required by the connected system and the conditions being verified. Missing permissions stay visible as missing coverage or Unknown rather than being hidden behind a green status.

Panaptico is designed around inspectable evidence and customer-controlled data architecture. Deployment and residency requirements are handled with the customer, while every result remains traceable to its source, timestamp, freshness, and definition version.

You declare the intent.
Panaptico proves the reality.

Continuously verify the systems, changes, and controls your business depends on.